The Survey Of Relationships Between Knowledge Inertia, Organizational Learning And Organizational Innovation Utilizing Structural Equation Model In Telecom Company Yazd
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63053/ijhes.189Keywords:
inertia of knowledge, organizational learning, innovation, knowledge managementAbstract
Nowadays knowledge play an important role in organizations and successful management of knowledge is the key characteristic of organizations survival.
However, in order to save time and energy and avoid the risk, generally, when people are faced to the problems, they resort to their past knowledge and experience to find solutions. This repetitive strategy for problem solving is called "inertia of knowledge" In this regard, the present study attempts to evaluate the relationship between inertia of knowledge and organizational learning and innovation, considering knowledge management as modulators variable, in telecommunication company of Yazd province. For this purpose, 100 questionnaires were sent to the Telecommunication Company and finally80questionnaireswere collected. Then collected data are reviewed and analyzed by Spss and Smart pls software.
The results suggest that knowledge inertia has significant negative effects on organizational learning and innovation. The results also suggest that although the knowledge management has negative modulators effect, but this effect is not significant.
References
1. Dehghan Najm, Mansour, (2009), "Knowledge Management and Its Role in Organizational Innovation", Automotive Engineering and Related Industries Monthly, Year 1, Issue 10, pp. 46-52
2. Robbins, Stephen. (2001). "Fundamentals of Organizational Behavior", Ghasem Kabiri, Tehran: Azad University Scientific Publications, 6th Edition
3. Saedi, Mehdi; Yazdani, Hamidreza, (2009), "Presenting a Process Model for Implementing Knowledge Management Based on Organizational Learning in Iran Khodro: A Data-Based Theory", Information Technology Management Journal, Volume 1, Issue 2.
4. Mirkamali, Seyed Mohammad (2009). "Leadership and Educational Management". Tehran: Yastron
5. Nisi, Abdolhossein; Rangbari, Mahmoud, (2009); "Investigating the factors affecting the successful establishment of knowledge management (case study: Khuzestan Province Information Organization)", Management Perspective, No. 33, pp. 125-142
6. Hooman, Heydar Ali (2006), "Multivariate Data Analysis in Behavioral Research", 2nd edition, Tehran, Pik Farhang PublicationsAmabile, T. M. (1998).» A Model of creativity and Innovation in Organizations Research in organizational behavior«, 10: 123-167
7. Argyris C, And D.A. Schon; (1978) »organizationa learning; A theory of Action Perspective, Reading«, Mass; Addison- Wesley Publishing Company.
8. Beckman,R.(1999),»Collaborative knowledge«, Human Resource lanning, 22(1), 22-33 .
9. Bhatnagar,J. (2006),» Measuring organizational learning capability in Indian managers and establishing firm performance linkage«,The Learning Organization. Vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 416-433.
10. Chin, W. W. (1998).» The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research, Marcoulides«, G.A. (ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. 1295-1336
11. Darroch, J., & McNaugton, R. (2002).» Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation«. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 210-222
12. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F. (1981).» Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error«. Journal of Marketing Research. 18.39-50
13. Huber, F., Herrmann, A. (2007).» Kausal modellierung mit Partial Least Squares- Eine anwendung sorientierte Einfiihrung«. Wiesbaden: Gabler
14. Hung, Y. C., Huang, S. M., Lin, Q. P. (2005),» Critical Factors in Adopting a Knowledge Management System for Pharmaceutical Industry«, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 105 (2), 164-183
15. Jimenez-Jimenez, D. (2008).» Fostering Innovation: The role of market orientation and organizational learning«. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(3), 389-412.
16. Liao , shu-h sien , Fei , Wu-chen , Liu , chih- Tang (2008), Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation; Technovation 28, pp: 183-195.
17. Liao, S.H.,)2002(.» Problem solving and knowledge inertia«. Expert Systems with Applications 22, 21–31.
18. Malhotra, Y. (1998), "Tools@work: Deciphering the KM Hype", Journal of Quality and Participation, 21 (4), 58-60.
19. Nonaka, I.)1994(.» A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation«. Organization Science 15 (1), 14–37.
20. OECD (2005), "Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data", Paris.
21. Rowley, J.,Baragheh, A.,Sambrook, (2011),»Towards an Innovation Type Mapping Tool«, Management Decision, Vol.49, No.1
22. Sadegh Sharifirad,Mohammad(2010),» Relationship Between Knoledge Inertia And Organizational Learning«, International Journal of Information Technology and Knowledge Management, Volume 2, No. 2, pp. 323-327
23. Shalikar Sajjad, Nina Lahoutpour and Azizah Bt Abdul Rahman,(2011), "The Study on the Impact of Knowledge Inertia on Organization", Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(10): 1207-1213
24. Shalikar, S., S.H. Nikou,) 2011(. “A Review on the Impact of Knowledge Stagnation on Organization.”3rd International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing, Singapore, 479-482.
25. Stata, R., )1989(.» Organizational learning the key to management innovation«. Sloan Management Review Spring, 63–74.
26. Tippins, M., & Sohi, R. (2003)». IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning amissing link«. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 745-761.
27. Tiwana, A. (2000),» The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Practical Techniques for Building a Knowledge Management System«, 1st ed., Prentice-Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
28. The survey of Relationships between Knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organizational innovation utilizing structural equation model in telecom company Yazd
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of New Findings in Health and Educational Sciences (IJHES) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
You are free to:
-
Share — Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercially.
-
Adapt — Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercially.
-
No Revocation — The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the original publication, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in a way that suggests the author(s), IJHES, or the publisher endorses you or your use.
-
No Additional Restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors retain copyright in their work. By publishing with IJHES, authors grant the journal and Arvin Arena Scientific Publication the necessary non-exclusive rights to publish, reproduce, distribute, archive, and make the article publicly available.
Recommended attribution:
Author(s), “Article Title,” International Journal of New Findings in Health and Educational Sciences (IJHES), Year, DOI. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.
For the complete license terms, please refer to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
