Quality of Work Life and Mental Health: Investigating the Link in a Correlational Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63053/ijhes.138Keywords:
Quality of Work Life, Mental Health, Depression, Anxiety, StressAbstract
Mental health is a critical factor in employees’ overall well-being and performance, especially in high-demand industrial environments. Quality of work life, as a key organizational variable, can significantly influence psychological outcomes in the workplace. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between quality of work life and mental health among employees in a large industrial context. The statistical population included 12,500 employees of the steel industries in Isfahan in 2022, from which a sample of 348 individuals was selected through convenience sampling. The research method was descriptive-correlational. Data were collected using the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale (WRQoL-2) and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the data. The results indicated a statistically significant negative correlation between quality of work life and mental health components: depression (r = -0.269, p < 0.001), anxiety (r = -0.307, p < 0.001), and stress (r = -0.299, p < 0.001). These findings suggest that as employees’ quality of work life improves, their levels of depression, anxiety, and stress decrease. The study emphasizes the importance of enhancing work-life quality as a strategy to improve employees’ psychological well-being.
References
• Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10(2), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176
• Bakhshi, A., Azam, K., & Darvishi, S. (2018). The relationship between quality of work life and psychological well-being among industrial employees. Iranian Journal of Occupational Health, 15(4), 72–81.
• Carmichael, F., Fenton, S. J., Pinilla-Roncancio, M., Sing, M., & Sadhra, S. S. (2021). Workplace mental health: Employer responsibilities and effective interventions. Occupational Medicine, 71(3), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqaa229
• Cetrano, G., Tedeschi, F., Rabbi, L., Gosetti, G., Lora, A., Lamanna, D., & Fiorillo, A. (2017). The economic case for improving mental health and well-being in the workplace: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational Health, 59(3), 219–233.
• Easton, S., & Van Laar, D. (2018). Quality of working life questionnaire manual: WRQoL scale. Portsmouth, UK: Portsmouth University.
• Farhadi, A., Ghazanfari, F., & Haghdoost, M. (2015). Job stress and its relation with mental health among Iranian industrial employees. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(2), 89–97.
• Goda, M., Kobayashi, M., & Fukuda, T. (2023). Exploring the relationship between quality of work life and mental health among factory workers: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000322
• González-Baltazar, R., López, A., & Navarro, A. (2018). Quality of work life and emotional well-being in Mexican industrial settings. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(2), 100–110.
• Inarda, H. (2022). Work-life balance as a predictor of job satisfaction and mental health. Journal of Management Studies, 60(1), 48–58.
• Karatepe, O. M., Yavas, U., Babakus, E., & Deitz, G. D. (2021). The effects of high-performance work practices on burnout, turnover intentions, and job performance: Evidence from frontline employees in tourism. Journal of Business Research, 132, 476–486.
• Knofczynski, G. T., & Mundfrom, D. J. (2008). Sample sizes when using multiple linear regression for prediction. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(3), 431–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164407310131
• Kuhn, T. (2013). The social reality of mental health in the workplace: Deviant responses and organizational climate. Work and Stress, 27(3), 275–290.
• Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Psychology Foundation.
• Mazloumi, A., Rostamabadi, A., & Saraji, G. N. (2017). Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Work-Related Quality of Life Scale. Journal of Occupational Health, 59(2), 125–132.
• Mirkamali, S. M., & Thani, F. N. (2011). The relationship between quality of work life and job satisfaction of faculty members in Tehran University. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 1790–1794.
• Saidykhan, S. B., & Ceesay, E. A. (2020). Work-life satisfaction and well-being among public employees in The Gambia. African Journal of Human Resource Management, 8(1), 1–10.
• Uzonwanne, F. C., & Ijide, C. (2017). Work-family conflict and mental health in Nigeria’s public sector: The moderating role of organizational support. Public Organization Review, 17(3), 317–330.
• World Health Organization. (2004). Promoting mental health: Concepts, emerging evidence, practice (Summary Report). Geneva: WHO.
• Zhang, M., Zhang, J., Zhang, F., Zhang, L., & Feng, D. (2016). Work environment and mental health: Understanding the associations in the Chinese manufacturing industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(11), 1121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111121
• Zia, R., Mirza, M., & Shahid, R. (2021). Mental health and occupational stress in industrial workers: Evidence from Pakistan. Occupational Medicine Quarterly, 18(2), 55–64.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in the International Journal of New Findings in Health and Educational Sciences (IJHES) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
You are free to:
-
Share — Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, including commercially.
-
Adapt — Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, including commercially.
-
No Revocation — The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the original publication, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in a way that suggests the author(s), IJHES, or the publisher endorses you or your use.
-
No Additional Restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Authors retain copyright in their work. By publishing with IJHES, authors grant the journal and Arvin Arena Scientific Publication the necessary non-exclusive rights to publish, reproduce, distribute, archive, and make the article publicly available.
Recommended attribution:
Author(s), “Article Title,” International Journal of New Findings in Health and Educational Sciences (IJHES), Year, DOI. Licensed under CC BY 4.0.
For the complete license terms, please refer to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).



