Examining the decision-making style of managers and its effectiveness in the country's insurance industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63053/ijhes.17Keywords:
GDMS, decision-making styles, insurance managers, insurance industryAbstract
Undoubtedly, the main essence of any organization is the managers of that organization, and their decision-making has a significant impact on the movement and progress of organizations and forms the main foundation of the organization. The decision-making style of managers in the insurance industry is not only part of the vital pulses of this industry and insurance companies, but with these decisions facing a new cycle of the economic situation and the growing attitude of digitalization and developments, the importance and attention to this the issue has been noticed before and the future of insurance companies is influenced by the decision-making process of managers and determines its growth or decline.
Therefore, in this regard, our hypothesis originates from the fact that the effectiveness of these decisions is so effective that it determines the achievement or non-achievement of the organization's mission, and we believe that in this article while taking a general look at the views of elders and let's examine the decision-making styles of managers and the effectiveness of general decision-making styles in the country's insurance industry. For this purpose, a sample consisting of 74 managers of the country's insurance industry was formed in 2022-2023 at different levels. And the sampling method is the general decision-making styles questionnaire of GDMS Scott and Bruce, 1995, according to the test reliability and validity of sample data and related analyzes based on the approach and effective performance of the decision-making style, which is considered a valid tool in this field. The results obtained in the insurance industry are the result of the insurance industry managers using Intuitive and rational decision-making styles are more confident in their decisions than dependence and avoidance styles, although with the rise of organizational levels, due to the type of facing the issues, these decisions become preferable with an immediate approach.
References
- Hadizadeh Moghadam, Akram and Tehrani, Maryam. (1387). Investigating the relationship between general decision-making styles of managers in government organizations. Public Administration, 1(1),
-Mr. Yousefi, Alireza and Sharif, Nasim. Psychological studies, sixth year, winter 2019, number 4-- 132,138
-Robert keritner.,management ,publisher:Houghton mifflinco.,3 rd.,1986,p.
-koontez ,Harold $weirich Heinz,(1998),”management”,9th,ed,mc graw hill ,p135
-loizos th .haracleous,(1996),” Rational decision making: myth or reality?” management
development review,vol 7,no 4,p 16
-Oliveira,Arnaldo,(2007),” A discussion of rational and psychological decision-making theories
and models:the search for a cultural ethical decision-making model”
Electronic journal of business ethics and orginzation studies, vol 12,no 2,pp 12-13
-joseph e.champoux.,organizational behavior ,publisher:west publishing co.,1996,p.398
-thunholm,peter(2004),"Decision-making style: habit, style or both?”, Journal of personality and individual differences, pp 932-933 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00162-4
- Robbins, Stephen, P(2009); "Managing Today"; New Jersey: Prentice Hall, , P. 69
-Eberlin, Richard jay. (2005). The relationship among leadership styles, decision making and organizational justice: alliant international university-
-Hoy, K. W. & Miskel, G. C. (2008). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice (8th Ed.). New York: McGraw Hill, Inc
-Parker, A. .. , Wandi, B. B & Baruch, .. (0007), Maximizes versus Satisfiers: Decision ̊ Making Styles, Competence and Outcomes ,Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 2, no. 6, pp 342-344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500000486
-Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995)5 Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(5), 818-831 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055005017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
