The effectiveness of cognitive hypnotherapy on emotional regulation and rumination in divorced individuals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63053/ijhes.113Keywords:
Emotional regulation, Absolute, Rumination, Cognitive Behavioral HypnotherapyAbstract
The present study aimed to determine the effectiveness of cognitive hypnotherapy on emotional regulation and rumination in divorced individuals. The research method was a semi-experimental study with a pre-test-post-test design with a control group, and the statistical population of this study consisted of all divorced individuals of the First Companion Company in Tehran. Due to the conditions and limitations resulting from the outbreak of the coronavirus, 10 samples in each group and a total of 20 people were selected in a non-random purposeful manner and were divided into two experimental and control groups by drawing lots. The research tools included the Nolen-Hoeksima, Maro, and Fredrickson Ruminative Response Scale and the Gross and John Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Individuals in the experimental group underwent cognitive-behavioural hypnotherapy treatment in 10 sessions of 1:15 hours, in other words, a total of 12:30 hours, but no intervention was performed for the control group. At the end of one week after the end of the treatment, a post-test was taken from both groups and the data obtained were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis of covariance and SPSS-21 software. The results of the present study showed that the independent variable, unlike the suppression component, the cognitive appraisal component (P < 0.01, F = 27.96 (16 and 1)) affected emotion regulation. In addition, the use of the Bonferroni test showed that the adjusted means of cognitive appraisal (P < 0.01, SE = 1.30, ∆x̄ = 12.73) in the experimental group increased compared to the control group. Implementing the independent variable at a significance level of 0.01 affected the rumination of the participants in the study (P < 0.01, F = 12.150 (17 and 1)). Comparison of the adjusted means of the two experimental and control groups using the Bonferroni post hoc test showed that the implementation of the independent variable caused the average rumination scores in the experimental group to decrease compared to the control group (p<0.01, SE=1.31, ∆x̄=16.06).
References
Parker G, Durante KM, Hill SE, Haselton MG. Why women choose divorce: An evolutionary perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2022;43:300-6.
Gross JJ. Emotion regulation in adulthood: Timing is everything. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2001;10(6):214-9.
Kobylińska D, Kusev P. Flexible Emotion Regulation: How Situational Demands and Individual Differences Influence the Effectiveness of Regulatory Strategies. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10:72.
Borjali, A, Aazami, Y., Chopan, H. The Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies Training on Reducing of Sensation Seeking in Drug-Dependent Persons. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2016;8(2):33-42.
Gross JJ, Barrett LF. Emotion Generation and Emotion Regulation: One or Two Depends on Your Point of View. Emot Rev. 2011;3(1):8-16.
Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology. 2002;39(3):281-91.
Najmi S. Thought suppression. Oxford Handbooks Online: Oxford University Press; 2013.
Carew CL, Milne AM, Tatham EL, MacQueen GM, Hall GBC. Neural systems underlying thought suppression in young women with, and at-risk, for depression. Behavioural Brain Research. 2013;257:13-24.
Geisler FCM, Schröder-Abé M. Is emotion suppression beneficial or harmful? It depends on self-regulatory strength. Motivation and Emotion. 2015;39(4):553-62.
van Schie K, Wanmaker S, Yocarini I, Bouwmeester S. Psychometric qualities of the Thought Suppression Inventory-Revised in different age groups. Personality and Individual Differences. 2016;91:89-97.
Namdarpour F, Fatehizade M, Bahrami F, Mohammadi Fesharaki R. Mental Rumination Consequences in Women with Marital Conflicts: A Qualitative Study. journal of counseling research. 2018;17(67):122-53.
Cameron S, Brown VJ, Dritschel B, Power K, Cook M. Understanding the relationship between suicidality, current depressed mood, personality, and cognitive factors. Psychology and psychotherapy. 2017;90(4):530-49.
Whisman MA, du Pont A, Butterworth P. Longitudinal associations between rumination and depressive symptoms in a probability sample of adults. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2020;260:680-6.
Querstret D, Cropley M. Assessing treatments used to reduce rumination and/or worry: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2013;33(8):996-1009.
Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review. 2010;30(2):217-37.
Tucker RP, Wingate LR, O’Keefe VM, Mills AC, Rasmussen K, Davidson CL, et al. Rumination and suicidal ideation: The moderating roles of hope and optimism. Personality and Individual Differences. 2013;55(5):606-11.
Murphy ER, Barch DM, Pagliaccio D, Luby JL, Belden AC. Functional connectivity of the amygdala and subgenual cingulate during cognitive reappraisal of emotions in children with MDD history is associated with rumination. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2016;18:89-100.
Aftab R, Karbalaee Mohammad Meigouni A, Taghiloo S. The mediating role of emotion regulation strategies in relationship between borderline personality and conjugal violence. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2015;8(32):7-27.
Kihlstrom JF. Hypnosis and hypnotherapy. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology: Elsevier; 2022.
Nolen-Hoeksema S, Morrow J. A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster: the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1991;61(1):115-21.
Nolen-Hoeksema S, Parker LE, Larson J. Ruminative coping with depressed mood following loss. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1994;67(1):92-104.
Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85(2):348-62.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.