The Psychological and Social Underpinnings of Political Belief Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63053/ijhes.94Keywords:
Reflective Reasoning, Political Belief Formation, Deliberative Democracy, directional motivated reasoning, Belief CultivationAbstract
In this study we will, examine the complicated psychological and social forces that produce political attitudes. The paper reveals the twofold nature of the cognitive processes; how emotive and cognitive biases influence reasoning about politics. The findings reveal that one of the common types of directional motivated reasoning is one in which the pre-held belief impacts the treatment of political information, which in turn results in biased assessment of political personalities and issues. Other than that, this research discusses the role of conversation and deliberation in the promotion of reflective political opinions. Discussion with others persuades a person to express an opinion and to listen to others that develop one's thinking of political matters. The paper also discusses the emotions, such as anxiety and anger, associated with political judgment, maintaining that such emotions distort and occlude any lucid judgment about political performance. It also reveals that scientific curiosity acts to offset such one-sidedness: "The more scientifically curious anyone is, the more open they will be to information that runs counter to pre-existing points of view, allowing them to reason more impartially."
Findings underpin views that a critical thinking-open discussion environment will be highly instrumental in raising political awareness and understanding. The present study bequeaths an important understanding of the psychological mechanisms underlying the construction of political opinion and the social processes that can help consolidate or contest these opinions. Controlling these factors sets up a better ability to confront polarization and misinformation in modern political discourses
References
Achen, Christopher; Bartels, Larry (2017): Democracy for Realists: Princeton University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400888740
Arceneaux, Kevin; Vander Wielen, Ryan J. (2018): Taming intuition. How reflection minimizes partisan reasoning and promotes democratic accountability. Cambridge United Kingdom, New York NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108227643
Arendt, Hannah (1999): Lectures on Kant's political philosophy. Paperback ed., 5. print. Edited by Ronald Beiner. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Bächtiger, André; Dryzek, John S.; Mansbridge, Jane; Warren, Mark E. (2018): The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.001.0001
Bakker, Bert N.; Lelkes, Yphtach; Malka, Ariel (2020): Understanding Partisan Cue Receptivity: Tests of Predictions from the Bounded Rationality and Expressive Utility Perspectives. In The Journal of Politics 82 (3), pp. 1061–1077. DOI: 10.1086/707616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/707616
Barabas, Jason (2004): How Deliberation Affects Policy Opinions. In American Political Science Review 98 (4), pp. 687–701. DOI: 10.1017/S0003055404041425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404041425
Barker, David C. (2018): Cognitive Deliberation, Electoral Decision Making, and Democratic Health*. In Social Science Quarterly 99 (3), pp. 962–976. DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.12475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12475
Baron, Jonathan (2018): Individual Mental Abiities vs. the World's Problems. In Journal of Intelligence 6 (2). DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence6020023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6020023
Baron, Jonathan (2019): Actively open-minded thinking in politics. In Cognition 188, pp. 8–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.004
Birch, Sarah; Allen, Nicholas J.; Sarmiento-Mirwaldt, Katja (2017): Anger, Anxiety and Corruption Perceptions: Evidence from France. In Political Studies 65 (4), pp. 893–911. DOI: 10.1177/0032321717691294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717691294
Bisgaard, Martin (2015): Bias Will Find a Way: Economic Perceptions, Attributions of Blame, and Partisan-Motivated Reasoning during Crisis. In The Journal of Politics 77 (3), pp. 849–860. DOI: 10.1086/681591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/681591
Bisgaard, Martin (2019): How Getting the Facts Right Can Fuel Partisan‐Motivated Reasoning. In American journal of political science 63 (4), pp. 824–839. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12432
Bolsen, Toby; Druckman, James N.; Cook, Fay Lomax (2014): The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion. In Political Behavior 36 (2), pp. 235–262. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-013-9238-0
Bolsen, Toby; Palm, Risa (Eds.) (2019): Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics: Oxford University Press.
Brader, Ted (2005): Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions. In American journal of political science 49 (2), pp. 388–405. DOI: 10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x
Bullock, John G.; Gerber, Alan S.; Hill, Seth J.; Huber, Gregory A. (2015): Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics. In QJPS 10 (4), pp. 519–578. DOI: 10.1561/100.00014074. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014074
Cacioppo, John T.; Petty, Richard E. (1982): The need for cognition. In Journal of personality and social psychology 42 (1), pp. 116–131. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.42.1.116
Christensen, Julian; Moynihan, Donald P. (2024): Motivated reasoning and policy information: Politicians are more resistant to debiasing interventions than the general public. In Behavioural public policy 8 (1), pp. 47–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.50
Clifford, Scott; Kirkland, Justin H.; Simas, Elizabeth N. (2019): How Dispositional Empathy Influences Political Ambition. In The Journal of Politics 81 (3), pp. 1043–1056. DOI: 10.1086/703381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/703381
Cohen, Arthur R.; Stotland, Ezra; Wolfe, Donald M. (1955): An experimental investigation of need for cognition. In The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51 (2), p. 291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042761
Cohen, Geoffrey L. (2003): Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. In Journal of personality and social psychology 85 (5), pp. 808–822. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808
Colombo, Céline (2018): Hearing the Other Side? – Debiasing Political Opinions in the Case of the Scottish Independence Referendum. In Political Studies 66 (1), pp. 23–42. DOI: 10.1177/0032321717723486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717723486
Dahl, Robert A. (2008): Polyarchy: Participation and opposition: Yale university press.
Davis, Mark H. (1983): Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. In Journal of personality and social psychology 44 (1), pp. 113–126. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.44.1.113
Delli Carpini, Michael X. (2000): In search of the informed citizen: What Americans know about politics and why it matters. In The Communication Review 4 (1), pp. 129–164. DOI: 10.1080/10714420009359466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420009359466
Enns, Peter K.; McAvoy, Gregory E. (2012): The Role of Partisanship in Aggregate Opinion. In Political Behavior 34 (4), pp. 627–651. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-011-9176-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9176-7
Fishkin, James S. (2009): When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation: OUP Oxford.
Fishkin, James S. (2018): Democracy when the people are thinking: Revitalizing our politics through public deliberation: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198820291.001.0001
Fishkin, James S.; Luskin, Robert C. (2005): Experimenting with a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion. In Acta Polit 40 (3), pp. 284–298. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ap.5500121
Frederick, Shane (2005): Cognitive reflection and decision making. In Journal of Economic perspectives 19 (4), pp. 25–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
Gadarian, Shana Kushner; Albertson, Bethany (2014): Anxiety, Immigration, and the Search for Information. In Political Psychology 35 (2), pp. 133–164. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12034
Gastil, John (2008): Political communication and deliberation: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329208
Gastil, John (2018): The Lessons and Limitations of Experiments in Democratic Deliberation. In Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14 (1), pp. 271–291. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113639. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110316-113639
Gerber, Marlène; Bächtiger, André; Fiket, Irena; Steenbergen, Marco; Steiner, Jürg (2014): Deliberative and non-deliberative persuasion: Mechanisms of opinion formation in EuroPolis. In European Union Politics 15 (3), pp. 410–429. DOI: 10.1177/1465116514528757. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116514528757
Goodin, Robert E. (2000): Democratic deliberation within. In Philosophy & Public Affairs 29 (1), pp. 81–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00081.x
Groenendyk, Eric; Krupnikov, Yanna (2021): What Motivates Reasoning? A Theory of Goal‐Dependent Political Evaluation. In American journal of political science 65 (1), pp. 180–196. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12562
Gutmann, Amy; Thompson, Dennis F. (2009): Democracy and disagreement: Harvard University Press.
Habermas, Jürgen (1985): The theory of communicative action: Volume 2: Lifeword and system: A critique of functionalist reason: Beacon press (2).
Hahn, Ulrike; Merdes, Christoph; Sydow, Momme von (2024): Knowledge through social networks: Accuracy, error, and polarisation. In PloS one 19 (1), e0294815. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294815
Halperin, Eran; Gross, James J. (2011): Intergroup anger in intractable conflict: Long-term sentiments predict anger responses during the Gaza war. In Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 14 (4), pp. 477–488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210377459
Hutmacher, Fabian; Reichardt, Regina; Appel, Markus (2024): Motivated reasoning about climate change and the influence of Numeracy, Need for Cognition, and the Dark Factor of Personality. In Scientific Reports 14 (1), p. 5615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55930-9
Iyengar, Shanto; Hahn, Kyu S. (2009): Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use. In Journal of Communication 59 (1), pp. 19–39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
Johnston, Christopher D.; Lavine, Howard; Woodson, Benjamin (2015): Emotion and Political Judgment. In Political Research Quarterly 68 (3), pp. 474–492. DOI: 10.1177/1065912915593644. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915593644
Kahan, Dan M. (2013): Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. In Judgment and Decision making 8 (4), pp. 407–424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500005271
Kahan, Dan M.; Landrum, Asheley; Carpenter, Katie; Helft, Laura; Hall Jamieson, Kathleen (2017): Science Curiosity and Political Information Processing. In Political Psychology 38 (S1), pp. 179–199. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12396
Kam, Cindy D. (2006): Political Campaigns and Open-Minded Thinking. In The Journal of Politics 68 (4), pp. 931–945. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00481.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00481.x
Kim, Nuri; Fishkin, James S.; Luskin, Robert C. (2018): Intergroup Contact in Deliberative Contexts: Evidence From Deliberative Polls. In Journal of Communication 68 (6), pp. 1029–1051. DOI: 10.1093/joc/jqy056. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy056
Klar, Samara (2014): Partisanship in a Social Setting. In American journal of political science 58 (3), pp. 687–704. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12087
Leeper, Thomas J.; Slothuus, Rune (2014): Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation. In Political Psychology 35 (S1), pp. 129–156. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12164
Lindell, Marina; Bächtiger, André; Grönlund, Kimmo; Herne, Kaisa; Setälä, Maija; Wyss, Dominik (2017): What drives the polarisation and moderation of opinions? Evidence from a Finnish citizen deliberation experiment on immigration. In European Journal of Political Research 56 (1), pp. 23–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12162
Marcus, George E. (2000): Emotions in politics. In Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1), pp. 221–250. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.221
Marcus, George E.; MacKuen, Michael B. (1993): Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement During Presidential Campaigns. In American Political Science Review 87 (3), pp. 672–685. DOI: 10.2307/2938743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2938743
Mason, Lilliana (2015): “I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization. In American journal of political science 59 (1), pp. 128–145. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089
Mason, Lilliana (2018): Uncivil agreement: How politics became our identity: University of Chicago press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001
Mullinix, Kevin J. (2016): Partisanship and Preference Formation: Competing Motivations, Elite Polarization, and Issue Importance. In Political Behavior 38 (2), pp. 383–411. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-015-9318-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-015-9318-4
Muradova, Lala (2021): Seeing the Other Side? Perspective-Taking and Reflective Political Judgements in Interpersonal Deliberation. In Political Studies 69 (3), pp. 644–664. DOI: 10.1177/0032321720916605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720916605
Muradova, Lala; Arceneaux, Kevin (2022a): Political Belief Formation: Individual Differences and Situational Factors. In The Cognitive Science of Belief: A Multidisciplinary Approach, p. 279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009001021.021
Muradova, Lala; Arceneaux, Kevin (2022b): Reflective political reasoning: Political disagreement and empathy. In European Journal of Political Research 61 (3), pp. 740–761. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12490
Muradova, Lala; Marien, Sofie; Felicetti, Andrea (2021): Reasoning Across the Divide: Interpersonal Deliberation, Emotions and Reflective Political Reasoning.
Mutz, Diana C. (2002): Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. In American Political Science Review 96 (1), pp. 111–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004264
Nir, Lilach (2011): Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion Perception. In Public opinion quarterly 75 (3), pp. 504–532. DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfq076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq076
Parkinson, John; Mansbridge, Jane (2012): Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139178914
Pennycook, Gordon; Rand, David G. (2019): Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. In Cognition 188, pp. 39–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
Redlawsk, David P. (2002): Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making. In The Journal of Politics 64 (4), pp. 1021–1044. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2508.00161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00161
Redlawsk, David P.; Civettini, Andrew J. W.; Emmerson, Karen M. (2010): The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”? In Political Psychology 31 (4), pp. 563–593. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00772.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00772.x
Robison, Joshua (2020): Does Social Disagreement Attenuate Partisan Motivated Reasoning? A Test Case Concerning Economic Evaluations. In Brit. J. Polit. Sci. 50 (4), pp. 1245–1261. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123418000315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000315
Robison, Joshua; Leeper, Thomas J.; Druckman, James N. (2018): Do Disagreeable Political Discussion Networks Undermine Attitude Strength? In Political Psychology 39 (2), pp. 479–494. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12374
Simas, Elizabeth N.; Clifford, Scott; Kirkland, Justin H. (2020): How empathic concern fuels political polarization. In American Political Science Review 114 (1), pp. 258–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000534
Stanovich, Keith E. (2011): Rationality and the reflective mind: Oxford University Press, USA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341140.001.0001
Stanovich, Keith E.; West, R. F.; Hertwig, R. (2000): Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-The questionable utility of cognitive ability in explaining cognitive illusions. In Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5), 645-65; discussion 665-726. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00003435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003435
Stanovich, Keith E.; West, Richard F. (1997): Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. In Journal of educational psychology 89 (2), p. 342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.89.2.342
Suiter, Jane; Farrell, David M.; O’Malley, Eoin (2016): When do deliberative citizens change their opinions? Evidence from the Irish Citizens’ Assembly. In International Political Science Review 37 (2), pp. 198–212. DOI: 10.1177/0192512114544068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114544068
Taber, Charles S.; Lodge, Milton (2016): The illusion of choice in democratic politics: The unconscious impact of motivated political reasoning. In Political Psychology 37, pp. 61–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12321
Vegetti, Federico; Mancosu, Moreno (2020): The Impact of Political Sophistication and Motivated Reasoning on Misinformation. In Political Communication 37 (5), pp. 678–695. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2020.1744778. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1744778
Willenborg, Amber; Detmering, Robert (2025): " I Don't Think Librarians Can Save Us": The Material Conditions of Information Literacy Instruction in the Misinformation Age. Available online at https://ir.library.louisville.edu/faculty/949/.
Wojcieszak, Magdalena; Price, Vincent (2010): Bridging the Divide or Intensifying the Conflict? How Disagreement Affects Strong Predilections about Sexual Minorities. In Political Psychology 31 (3), pp. 315–339. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00753.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00753.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
