From Shared Stress to Shared Strength: A Theoretical Model of Dyadic Coping in Couples Facing Depression and Anxiety
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63053/ijhes.140Keywords:
Dyadic coping; depression; anxiety; couple therapy; emotion regulation; systemic theory; resilience; relational psychopathologyAbstract
Depression and anxiety are among the most common psychological disorders worldwide, often occurring within the context of close relationships. While significant progress has been made in understanding their intrapersonal dynamics, less attention has been paid to how these disorders manifest and are managed within romantic dyads. This conceptual paper proposes the Dyadic Spiral of Vulnerability and Resilience (DSVR)—a theoretical model that integrates clinical symptomatology with systemic and interpersonal coping processes. The model delineates two potential trajectories couples may follow when confronted with psychological distress: a spiral of vulnerability characterized by misattunement and symptom escalation, and a spiral of resilience shaped by emotional co-regulation, shared meaning-making, and dyadic agency. By situating emotional suffering within a relational framework, the DSVR model advances current theory in couple therapy and health psychology. Implications for clinical intervention, empirical research, and relational education are discussed, highlighting the transformative potential of connection in the face of shared stress.
References
Organization, W.H., Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. 2017.
Collaborators, G.M.D., Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2022. 9(2): p. 137-150.
Falconier, M.K. and R. Kuhn, Dyadic coping in couples: A conceptual integration and a review of the empirical literature. Frontiers in psychology, 2019. 10: p. 571.
King, J.A., et al., Cognitive overcontrol as a trait marker in anorexia nervosa? Aberrant task-and response-set switching in remitted patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2019. 128(8): p. 806.
Randall, A.K., et al., Couples’ co-regulation dynamics as a function of perceived partner dyadic coping. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 2021. 34(6): p. 597-611.
Greenman, P.S. and S.M. Johnson, Emotionally focused therapy: Attachment, connection, and health. Current opinion in psychology, 2022. 43: p. 146-150.
Cohrdes, C., et al., Support-and meaning-focused coping as key factors for maintaining adult quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Frontiers in public health, 2023. 11: p. 1196404.
Diamond, G.M., et al., Alliance-building interventions with adolescents in family therapy: A process study. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 1999. 36(4): p. 355.
Bodenmann, G., A.K. Randall, and M.K. Falconier, Coping in couples: the systemic transactional model (STM), in Couples coping with stress. 2016, Routledge. p. 5-22.
Helgeson, V.S., et al., Communal coping and adjustment to chronic illness: Theory update and evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2018. 22(2): p. 170-195.
Beck, A.T. and E.A. Haigh, Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: The generic cognitive model. Annual review of clinical psychology, 2014. 10(1): p. 1-24.
Cuijpers, P., et al., Psychotherapy for depression across different age groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA psychiatry, 2020. 77(7): p. 694-702.
Randall, A.K. and G. Bodenmann, Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction. Current opinion in psychology, 2017. 13: p. 96-106.
Branje, S.J., et al., Longitudinal associations between perceived parent-child relationship quality and depressive symptoms in adolescence. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 2010. 38: p. 751-763.
Zaki, J. and W.C. Williams, Interpersonal emotion regulation. Emotion, 2013. 13(5): p. 803.
McRae, J., et al., The experiences of individuals with cervical spinal cord injury and their family during post-injury care in non-specialised and specialised units in UK. BMC health services research, 2020. 20: p. 1-11.
Rusu, P.P., et al., Stress, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction: A longitudinal study disentangling timely stable from yearly fluctuations. PloS one, 2020. 15(4): p. e0231133.
Papp, L.M. and N.L. Witt, Romantic partners' individual coping strategies and dyadic coping: implications for relationship functioning. Journal of family psychology, 2010. 24(5): p. 551.
Zhao, C., et al., Testing the associations between attachment anxiety, relational aggression and depressive symptoms in romantic relationships: actor-partner interdependence model and actor-partner interdependence mediator model. Journal of youth and adolescence, 2024. 53(12): p. 2776-2788.
Joiner, T.E. and K.A. Timmons, Depression in its interpersonal context. Handbook of depression, 2002. 2: p. 322-339.
Kołodziejczak, K., Facets and Correlates of Sexuality in Late Adulthood. 2022, Dissertation, Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2022.
Fitzsimons, G.M. and E.J. Finkel, Interpersonal influences on self-regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2010. 19(2): p. 101-105.
Weitkamp, K., et al., Dyadic coping in couples facing chronic physical illness: a systematic review. Frontiers in psychology, 2021. 12: p. 722740.
Friedlander, M.L., L. Heatherington, and G.M. Diamond, Systemic and conjoint couple and family therapies: Recent advances and future promise. 2021.
Zhou, G., W. Chen, and Y. Wu, Research on the effect of authenticity on revisit intention in heritage tourism. Frontiers in Psychology, 2022. 13: p. 883380.
Mazzuca, S., et al., Emotion regulation and satisfaction in long-term marital relationships: The role of emotional contagion. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2019. 36(9): p. 2880-2895.
English, T., O.P. John, and J.J. Gross, Emotion regulation in close relationships. 2013.
Clark, M.S., L.A. Beck, and O.R. Aragón, Relationship initiation: Bridging the gap between initial attraction and well-functioning communal relationships. 2019.
Hogue, A., et al., Family Support Protocol for Adolescent Internalizing Disorders: Protocol for a Pre-Post Quantitative Treatment Development Study. JMIR Research Protocols, 2024. 13(1): p. e64332.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The journal is licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.